Litrature Review On Cross Cultural Management for Business

Question: Write about theLitrature Review On Cross Cultural Management for Business. Answer: Introduction In the past decades, there have been increased social interactions that have resulted in cultural diversity. The cultural diversity in many institutions causes different behaviors of employees calling for the need of cross-cultural management to enable each person in a society to accommodate the diverse cultural practices. The cross-cultural management is essential in the global leadership as it enables effective management of diverse people with diverse cultural behavior. This paper is a literature review of an article on the development of cross-cultural management to the global leadership with emphasis on the culture and business, culture and MNCs, and culture and communication. According to the article, cross-cultural management and global leadership are interrelated and have a long history. The article denotes that cross-cultural management arose simultaneously with organizations behavior and management back in the 1900s and not as a result of the World War II. The early works of cross culture management consisted of identification of the theories that were capable of relating and making cultures relevant to others. However, these theories lacked sophisticated approaches for difference exploration of cultures. From1960 to 1980, cross-cultural management focused on the study of organizational behavior and management systems of other countries apart from the United States that had cultural settings that were perceived as foreign. (Weber 2016).After the World War II, many organizations mainly from America moved across borders in search of a market for their products. These firms sent expatriates to the overseas countries to oversee the management of those for eign investments by training the local managers; however, the management was not easy as in the mother countries as a result of the effect of local cultures, political, business, and legal system. There was a need to extend the American management techniques by expatriates who had difficulty in adapting to the local cultures and assigning of the local employees led to global leadership. This led to an organizational restructuring of most of the multinational corporations from the multi-domestic, regional and matrix organizational structures, thus required expatriate to acquire more skills that enabled them efficiently operated in those foreign countries. This led to the development of Hofstedes cultural theory used by current global leaders. Cross-Cultural Management Cross-cultural management refers to the process of accommodating and controlling differences cultural practices in an organization to allow mutual understanding among employees of the different cultures. Multinational Corporations are companies that operate in some countries with all operations done from the home country. Such group companies are always subdivided into four main categories that are: multinational, decentralized corporation with the availability of stable home country (Molwa et al. 2013, p.10). The centralized global corporation that tends to acquire cheaper resources on the availability of support that is more cheaper thus international companies that develops Parent Corporations technology, and the transnational enterprise that applies the three approaches in their operation. Cross-cultural management entailed research on leadership related issues and categorized into uni-cultural, comparative, and intercultural. The uni-cultural emphasize on the organizational management within a single country, for example, the German organizations that have provided dynamic knowledge on country-specific and culture-specific leadership. The comparative emphasize on the comparison of two or more countries for example in Mexico, based on psychological and the sociological perspectives that employee the cultural theories and frameworks to explore the perspectives Turkey and India. Previous comparatives leadership studies indicate large differences in the leadership style and followers behavior between or among many cultures. For example, the collectivist cultures people are more like to follow a leader than individualistic cultures, and leaders in the high power distance are more authoritative than leaders from the low power distance. Finally the intercultural research entailed the study among many countries and focuses on how an individual from one successfully or unsuccessfully blend with cultural differences associated with management practices. All these categories utilize culture as the basis of the operations since there is always the availability of numerous employees with a diverse background. Cultural differences tend to affect organization trade behaviors, therefore, changing the international trade practices that are much far different with the parent country, therefore require proper cultural management since they are always faced with difficulty in decision making, marketing problems and safety issues. Cross-cultural management requires applications of various theories such as Hofstede's model that entails individualism/ collectivism, masculinity/feminist/ uncertainty/avoidance, and power distance (Garriott et al. 2017, p.306). The approach provides various reasons of cultural behavior of employees from a different background, for example, in power distance cultures; individuals are always in love for power and always feel very bad when giving orders by other people. An employee from countries such as Malaysia tends to show great deference to those that are on the higher ranks of authority, unlike that individual from the low culture embrace discussion across all levels of participation. The individualistic cultures such as from the United Kingdom, express independence of employees in completing tasks while the collectivist cultures such as China embraces a lot of group work. With all these, it is evidential that every multinational corporation requires varied ways of management to succeed and this can only be possible when the company strikes a balance in honoring all the cultures. The reasonable way of honoring all the cultures in a multinational corporation is to create a community culture across all the offices, various lines of communication and a social media group that will link all employees from different cultures into a common mission. Culture and Communication Globalization of leaders forces the introduction of cross-cultural communication. According to the article, cross culture communication is the effective way of an individual executes communication behaviors that negotiate with cultural identity in a cultural environment. Culture determines the type of language being spoken and therefore influences the communication ability and style of the people in particular countries. Culture shapes peoples ways of thinking, seeing interpreting, and hearing (Oili Dong 2016, p.408). The difference in languages of different people in the same organization makes communication to be challenging as each culture offers a different set of rules and codes. Global leadership intercultural communication requires the acquisition of various skills such as mindfulness, behavioral flexibility, cognitive flexibility, tolerance of ambiguity and cross-cultural empathy. Mindfulness refers to the thinking process that enables one to process new information, new categories, and multiple perspectives. It helps one to be mindful of the subjective assumptions, emotions, and cognition. Cognitive flexibility enables one to compare multiple perspectives and consider a variety of frameworks. Behavioral flexibility refers to the individual skill of executing behaviors while tolerance ambiguity is the affinity to recognize ambiguous circumstance as desirable. Intercultural communication is divided into various contexts such as high-context versus low context, sequential versus synchronic, and affective versus neutral. In High context cultures such as Arabs, Asians tend to live a lot of unspecified messages, and therefore, nonverbal cues are essential in between the lines of communication (Lewis 2017, p.298). On the other hand, the low context cultures such as Britain have explicit and specific messages .Sequential cultures such as the United States tend to think of the time and embrace time as a linear commodity that requires proper management. These cultures are always business people and tend to pay full attention to specific agendas before moving into another one. While others such as Europe and Asia, tend to view time synchronically, as a steady supply that needs to be experienced in a moment and as a force that needs to restriction. These cultures view the time flow as the cycle with the constant relation of the past, present, and the future thereby influence how people and organizations of such cultures approach investment, deadlines and strategic thinking. Every international business, have specific practices and emotions, that majorly depend on the affective or neutral aspects. The individuals from the affective culture such as the U.S tend to readily show emotions while individual from the neutral cultures such as Japan tends to keep of restrain their feelings. These create differences in communication in a mixture of such culture; as most of the time, people expect confirmation n feelings and cues during the discussion. For example, if the communication approach is highly emotional, then direct emotional responses such as I feel the same way is best while when the communication approach is highly neutral, then indirect responses such as I concur with your ideas are more appropriate. Cross-Cultural Management Theories Several theories have been developed to explain the cross culture and the management of cross-cultural organizations. Among those theories, include Fons Trompennars and Charles Hampden Turner. Both Fons Trompenaars and Charles Hampden Turner identified about seven value orientation and classified culture as a mix of conduct and value design. Among the seven values identified include neutral versus emotional universalism versus particularism, individualism versus communitarians, achievements versus ascription, diffuse versus specific cultures, human versus relationship and human-nature relationship. The monochromic and polychromic cultural theory insist that culture have different insights of time, and time is the essential base on which all religions repose and around and which all events rotate. The monochromic culture insists on doing one thing at a time while the polychromic culture embraces the method of doing things at the same time. The Schwarz model developed by Hosted accounts seven basis cultural values that are: conversion hierarchy, intellectual autonomy, harmony, competency, and egalitarian. Implementation of Cross-Cultural Management According to Etowa and Debs-Ivall (2017) the transfer of cross-cultural knowledge, the creation of collaborative atmosphere, intercultural learning, interactive translation, cross-cultural networking, and development of competence are the major task that needs focus on cross-cultural management. Employees cultural awareness can be improved through effective cross-cultural training offered by the organization.The training focuses on the foreign cultures to enable each employee embraces different cultures that are available in the organization hence help the employees to have a mutual understanding. Additionally, training reduces the time required for the employees to understand different cultures (Alexxander, Havercomea Mujtaba 2015, p.16). Effective cross-cultural management requires the recruitment team to be ken during the employee selection to minimize future organizational grievance that might arise from the employees. Strengths and Weakness of the Main Article The main article has numerous strengths such clear explanation origin of global leader, and impacts of cross-cultural communications impacts to the effectiveness of the expatriates, like the Thurnau conference in Germany 1998. However, the article is still not definite with the definition of global. The term still does not comprise together all the cultural differences that affect the management of the international business. Strengths and Weakness of Cross-Cultural Management in Global Leadership The major strength of cross-cultural management in global leadership is the capability to foster innovation. Team members from different background share ideas that are combined to come up with a betters strategy, product, or service (Etowa Debs 2017, p.280) .Additionally, cross-cultural management help leaders to improve on their cultural awareness that eventually makes them to effectively manage people from diverse backgrounds. However, there is no identification of weakness of cross-cultural management on the global leadership. Literature Review Conclusion According to the above discussion, culture has different definitions across the world with primary references to the common belief and behaviors of a particular group of people that make them distinctive. Globalization exposes leaders to different business to acquire different cultural practices that at times cross one another; because of diversified values and communication styles. Therefore, the difference calls the need for the cross-cultural management. Multinational corporations depend on the cultures to shape the methods and channels of communications, which is the core of the daily operations of such business. Different models and theories such as Hofstede's theories among others have been developed to help such multinational corporations in managing cultures. The theories help the managers to understand the basis of the cultural differences and how the to tackle any busbies constraint brought about by cultural diversity. The main article has several strengths regarding the cross-cultural management in global leaders such as it provides the framework and development of global leadership. However, it does not define the term global concerning the culture. The cross-cultural management enables global leaders to have insights on how to effectively manage people from diverse backgrounds. List of References Alexander, V, Havercome, C, Mujtaba, B 2015, 'Effectively Managing Employees to Get Results in a Diverse Workplace such as American Express',Journal Of Business Studies Quarterly, 7, 1, pp. 13-26, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 29 April 2018. Etowa, J, Debs-Ivall, S 2017, 'Leadership and Organizational Commitment to Ethno-Cultural Diversity in Healthcare',Journal Of Ethnographic Qualitative Research, 11, 4, pp. 277-292, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 29 April 2018. Garriott, P, Faris, E, Frazier, J, Nisle, S, Galluzzo, J 2017, 'Multicultural and International Research in Four Career Development Journals: An 11-Year Content Analysis',Career Development Quarterly, 65, 4, pp. 302-314, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 29 April 2018. Lewis, GR 2017, 'General Revelation Makes Cross- Cultural Communication Possible',Evangelical Review Of Theology, 41, 4, pp. 292-307, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 29 April 2018 Mowla, M, Hoque, N, Mamun, A, Rahim-ud-Din, M 2013, 'Dynamics of Cross Cultural Management: A Critical Review',Abasyn University Journal Of Social Sciences, 6, 2, pp. 1-15, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 28 April 2018. Qili, L, Dong, C 2016, 'The Difficulties and Possibilities of Cross-Cultural Communication: A Case Study of the Global Development of the Confucius Institutes',Chinese Education Society, 49, 6, pp. 402-410, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 29 April 2018. Weber, O, Sulstarova, B, Singy, P 2016, 'Cross-Cultural Communication in Oncology: Challenges and Training Interests',Oncology Nursing Forum, 43, 1, pp. E24-E33, Academic Search Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 29 April 2018.